Blockbusters and Films
Movies and Cinema
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 May 2013

Rewrite and Restructure

It's been a while. Too long, in fact.

I'm finding the fact that I've written very little for this blog a horrible perpetual motion machine of annoyance. As much as I've love writing here, University deadlines, exams and a drying up of funds has lead to less cinema trips (and more DVD watching). Even more unfortunate is the fact that this all has resulted in an apathy for review writing because the blog looks so bare!

In solution to this suck-y state of affairs, I'm gonna change the mission statement of the blog. Where, originally, my intent was to give reviews of what was on at the cinema, what I'd recommend people see and what to stay away from, I think an all purpose cinema blog would be far easier to run.
The plan now is to have three different types of posts; to continue the "what's on at the cinema" section; to begin a "what I've been watching"  review section; and to have a space where I can voice general thoughts, opinions and ideas about movie related happenings going on around me. I hope there are still people interested enough to keep up looking through the posts and keeping up to date with everything new coming along. In an ideal world, this new system (and the five month holiday I find myself at the beginning of) will lead to a minimum of one review/update a week. If that works out well, and there are still people showing interesting, I'll endeavor to keep it on a more regular schedule when I return to Uni in September. 

Also, it has been pointed out to me, I'm not running the greatest looking site on the internet. Although, I am not the most artful person in the world, I'd love to have someone who knows how themes and blogs work to help me out if they have the time, and make the blog look better! Throw me and e-mail, or get me on Facebook if you wish to be my kind-hearted savior.

Thank you for your patience those who have come back to the blog to read this!

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Argo

One film this year I've managed to go into without any prior knowledge. I had no idea what to expect, and the first ten minutes had me very interested.

Ben Affleck directs as we start off with a thirty second tour of the history of Iranian politics and then move on to 1979 where we see the beginning of the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Sparking a revolution in Tehran the US Embassy is taken over and the 52 workers therein became hostages. But six escaped and as the action kicks off when they find themselves holed up in the house of the Canadian diplomat. Back in America, Tony Mendez (Affleck, Dogma) decides that the only way (the ONLY way) to get the hostages (well, six of them) out is to put together a fake film that will, at the height of the international tension, be shot in Iran.
Maybe you can tell, I'm not convinced.

As I say, Iranian politics of which I know less than nothing about, seems like an interesting premise for a film. I was looking forward to learning some new things, finding out the American perspective on these events, and maybe being given something to think about. I learned three important things; a) The writers of this film love the 70's and stressed even more is the fact that b) the writers of this film love movies and finally, and what impacted on me most about this film c) the writers of this film love films from the 70's. I mean, c'mon! Such a wide range of things that could be discussed and explored surrounding this event, but no. Nothing.

This would be acceptable, if and only if, the film was about something else. I think that may have been the intent of those involved, but god did it go down in flames. This "character" drama was filled with one dimensional people that even if you knew, you wouldn't care about. You have a main man who is difficult to care about at all, 'cause he's just pretty dull. The other six have no back stories and actually rarely feature except to occasionally remind you that they exist.

Basically, it was so promising that - even though it looked quite good, was occasionally humorous and the performances weren't awful - it ended as a crushing disappointment. It was dull, and with such a broad range of large themes, it seems almost impossible to have missed every single one so spectacularly.


Also, the joke around which they titled the film was funny the first time. To hear it then repeated over one hundred times just made me think that at one point the entire script was just funny situations where that joke could be made.